Feedback software comparison

Frill Alternatives: 3 Tools, Pricing and Switching Limits

Choose a Frill alternative around the workflow you want to change: one owner managing public requests, automatic feedback capture, or a public roadmap on your own domain. Compare Feedbackly, Canny, and Upvoty with Frill as the baseline. A cheaper subscription is useful only when the destination still supports the people, visibility, and customer communication your process requires.

By Feedbackly · Published plans checked

Compare pricing, fit, and limits

We publish Feedbackly. This comparison uses our supported capabilities and the official vendor pages linked below; it is not a hands-on test of competing products. Prices and plan details can change.

Published prices and workflow differences, checked 9 October 2026
ProductPublished priceUseful forCheck before choosing
Frill official pricingStartup: $25/monthPaid plans include unlimited admins and widgets; Startup allows 50 ideas and one survey.Check idea limits and the cost of privacy and white-labeling options.
Feedbackly official pricing$9/month or $90/yearPublic requests, voting, a roadmap, and reviewed Slack, Notion, or CSV imports for one board owner.No shared administration, private boards, or custom domains. CSV imports do not preserve votes or customer identities.
Canny official pricingFree: $0; Pro starts at $79/month, billed yearlyAutomatic feedback capture and a free entry plan with 25 tracked users.Budget using tracked-user requirements and the billing interval, rather than feedback volume alone.
Upvoty official pricingPower: $15/month, billed monthlyPower includes a public roadmap, custom domain, and unlimited boards in one project.Compare project limits and integration coverage with your workflow before switching.

Decide which parts of your Frill workflow must stay

List who manages requests, what customers can see, and how decisions reach them. Include work outside the ideas board: announcing releases, conducting surveys, retaining private evidence, and coordinating internal decisions. A feature list can suggest a shortlist, but each required task needs an observed result before you switch.

Feedbackly fits an owner-managed public request board with voting, comments, and a visible roadmap. Its subscription includes the embedded widget and custom branding. It does not provide shared administration, private boards, custom domains, or a native survey or announcements system. Keep a separate process for those tasks or choose a destination that covers them. Custom branding does not mean a custom domain.

In a fictional example, a solo founder uses one public board and reviews requests each week. Feedbackly is a candidate to test. A team requiring two independent board administrators has a different requirement that Feedbackly does not meet. Use the evaluation checklist to record that distinction before comparing subscription amounts.

Compare the package you will actually keep

The linked official pricing pages are the basis for the table. Frill's Startup plan lists $25 per month with 50 ideas; its paid tiers include unlimited administrators and widgets. Treat the starting price as a package to evaluate, then confirm the allowance and any required options for your own workflow.

For one owner, Feedbackly costs $9 monthly or $90 annually. Twelve monthly payments total $108; annual billing is a $90 upfront commitment. The $39 one-time purchase covers one board and excludes the subscription widget, custom branding, and Notion publishing. Its seven-day trial is temporary access. Compare the package you will use afterwards, rather than assuming every trial capability remains on the one-time plan.

Canny's published free plan provides an entry point with 25 tracked users; its Pro plan starts at $79 per month billed yearly. Upvoty's Power plan lists $15 per month billed monthly and includes a custom domain. Those are different billing and usage models. Record your expected participation, required administrators, billing interval, and essential capabilities beside each quote instead of choosing on the headline number alone.

Check migration limits and the customer handoff

Save your source records before preparing an import copy. Choose a small public-safe sample with a completed idea, an active request, a long description, and repeated evidence. Compare what the destination publishes with what you intended to retain. A readable title does not establish that the discussion, votes, or subscriptions survived.

Feedbackly has no native Frill migration connector. Its dashboard CSV backlog importer can map titles, descriptions, supported statuses, and valid original dates. Imported requests have zero votes; identities, comments, attachments, and follower subscriptions do not transfer. The separate board-creation CSV preview imports text and starts at Under review. Use the Frill migration guide for the backlog workflow and retain the source history for later questions.

Before replacing the public link, have a participant find a request, vote, add context, and follow a status change. Keep unresolved requirements visible in the decision. Then explain the new destination and retained history with the announcement template. The purpose of the pilot is to verify the work customers and the owner need to complete, not to claim that a switch guarantees faster delivery or more revenue.

Try the workflow with your own requests

Create a public board, review a small import, and test a status update. Seven days free, no credit card.